Linguistic Pyrrhonism: Self-Destruction, Dogmatic Assertions, and Skeptical Expressions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61378/cb2nrj43Keywords:
Skeptical Philosophy, Pyrrhonism, Language, Dogmatic Assertions, Self-destructionAbstract
Usually, in the context of linguistic skepticism, the focus is on interrogating the capacity of language to mirror reality. My starting point is to explore a position that has radically questioned the ability of language to faithfully represent reality and postulated that philosophy is only possible as a critique of language. Fritz Mauthner assumed a linguistic-epistemological skepticism, according to which language is a source of deception and superstitions. My aim is not a detailed analysis of Mauthner’s philosophy, but rather an attempt to answer the question: Is it possible to establish the relationship between philosophy and language starting from a skeptical philosophy that is not radical and negative? To defend the idea of a non-radical and actively skeptical approach, I will review the main ancient sources of Greek Pyrrhonism, Sextus Empiricus. My main purpose is not exegetical; I will take only those elements that enable me to defend the coherence of a Pyrrhonian philosophy without implying its self-destruction. I consider that Sextus Empiricus’ explorations of language, especially with regard to the reflection on the practice of philosophy as distinct from dogmatic assertions, allow me to present a viable and updatable sceptical philosophical proposal.
References
ARNES, K. M. “Linguistic Skepticism: Towards a Productive Definition”. Monatshefte, Vol. 74, No. 2, 1982, pp. 145-155.
BAILEY, A. “Pyrrhonean Scepticism and the Self-Refutation Argument”. The Philosophical Quarterly 40, 1990, pp. 27-44.
BAHR, F. F. “Estudio preliminar”. In: Muthner, F. Spinoza. Un bosquejo de su vida y su influencia. Córdoba: Encuentro Grupo Editor, 2011, pp. 7-30.
BORGES, J. L. Other Inquisitions (1937–1952). Translated by R. L. C. Simms. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1964.
BRITO, R. P. de. Sobre a noção de linguagem subjacente ao ceticismo pirrônico sextiano: um estudo do livro I de Esboços Pirrônicos, de Sexto Empírico, acompanhado de tradução e de uma investigação teórico-metodológica. UF de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Letras. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística, 2024.
BRITO, R. P. de. The Skeptical Dynamis and Its Pragmatic Possibilities. Springer International Publishing - Synthese Library, 2022.
CASTAGNOLI, L. “Self-bracketing Pyrrhonism”. In: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, XVIII, 2000, pp. 263-328.
CASTAGNOLI, L. Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
CORTI, L. “Mind and language of the Laërtian Pyrrhonist: Diog. Laert. IX 74-77”. In: Vogt, K. M. Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG, 2015, pp. 123-145.
DI TOMASO, S. “Pirronismo y criticismo: una lectura neopirrónica de la Sprachkritik de F. Mauthner”. In: Reinoso, G.; Uanini, F.; Di Tomaso, S. (Eds.) Neopirronismo clásico y contemporáneo. Discusiones en torno al legado escéptico. Córdoba: Colecciones del CiFFyH, 2024a, pp. 63-83.
DI TOMASO, S. “Lenguaje y filosofía: la Sprachkritik de F. Mauthner a la luz del Pirronismo”. Síntesis, (15), 2024b, pp. 43-59.
FOGELIN, R. “Wittgenstein and Classical Skepticism”. International Philosophical Quarterly, 21, March,1981, pp. 3-15.
FOGELIN, R. Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford University Press, 1994.
MAUTHNER, F. Contribuciones a una crítica del lenguaje. Barcelona: Herder, 2001.
MAUTHNER, F. O avesso das palavras. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2024.
MCPHERRAN, M. “Skeptical Homeopathy and Self-refutation”. Phronesis 32, 1987, pp. 290–328.
REINOSO, G. “Neopyrrhonism as Metaphilosophy: a Non-Quietist Proposal”. Praxis Filosófica, 2022, vol.54, pp. 11-30.
REINOSO, G. “Neopirronismo contemporáneo: una propuesta performativa”. En Neopirronismo clásico y contemporáneo. Discusiones en torno al legado escéptico. Reinoso, G.; Uanini, F.; Di Tomaso, S. (Eds.). Colecciones del Ciffyh, Área Filosofía, 2024, pp. 19-35.
SPINELLI, E. “Sceptics and Language: phōnaí and lógoi”. In: Sextus Empiricus. Histoire Épistémologie Langage. Tome 13, fascicule 2, 1991, pp. 57-70.
SEXTUS EMPIRICUS. Outlines of Scepticism, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, Ed. by Annas, J. and Barnes, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
SEXTUS EMPIRICUS. Against the Logicians. Bury, R. G., Vol.II. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1935.
SEXTUS EMPIRICUS. Against the Professors. Bury, R. G., Vol. IV. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1949.
SLUGA, H. “Wittgenstein and Pyrrhonism”. In: Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.) Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 99-117.
STOUGH, C. “Sextus Empiricus on Non-Assertion”. Phronesis Vol. 29, No. 2, 1984, pp. 137-164.
TURRI, J. “Pyrrhonian Skepticism Meets Speech-Act Theory”. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 2, 2012, pp. 83–98.
WEILER, G. Mauthner’s Critique of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I declare that the article or reviews or translation is original.
By publishing in this journal, I agree that:
a) my copyright will be maintained, granting the magazine the right of first publication.
b) I can assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g., publishing as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c) articles can be printed as long as the source of the journal is informed and the author (s) are duly credited.
